Russia · Corporate law · Disputes

Protecting the stake
without destroying the business.

A corporate conflict requires simultaneous protection of shareholder rights, evidence and the operating asset: governance, information, transactions, cash flows and a route to a new balance or exit.

First 72 hourspreserve evidence and status quo
Claim mapthe proper remedy for each breach
Interim reliefprotection without business shutdown
Settlementprice and execution agreed in advance

01

The first question is what must be preserved

In the opening days we establish ownership, registry records, governing bodies, bank mandates, critical assets, imminent meetings, disputed transactions and system access. We then define the commercial objective: restore governance, stop asset leakage, recover loss, obtain information or buy or sell the stake.

Control
Who can call meetings, sign and operate accounts.
Value
Which assets, contracts and cash flows create enterprise value.
Time
Challenge periods, registry actions and irreversible-change risk.
Exit
Real pricing, funding source and an executable transfer path.

02

Evidence is collected before the conflict becomes public

Preserve charters and shareholders’ agreements, notices, ballots, minutes, remote-meeting recordings, powers, banking records, communications, data-room and accounting data. Electronic evidence needs provenance, time and chain of custody.

03

Information access is an independent protection tool

Article 50 of the LLC Law defines corporate records and an access procedure. A demand identifies the documents, period, copy format, confidentiality and business purpose. The resulting material becomes a map of transactions, affiliations, cash flows and decisions.

04

Challenge a corporate decision together with its consequences

Review competence, notice, agenda, papers, quorum, majority, conflicts and record. Article 43 of the LLC Law sets a short special challenge period, so the decision, any resulting transaction and required registry actions are analysed together.

Voidable
A statutory or charter breach affecting the shareholder’s rights.
Void
For example, no required majority or an off-agenda decision without all participants.
Consequences
Invalidating an approval does not automatically unwind the transaction.
Time
Document when the shareholder knew or should have known.

05

A disputed transaction needs the correct ground and defendants

Distinguish authority, major transaction, related-party issue, abuse, sham, asset diversion or breach of a shareholders’ agreement. Test counterparty knowledge, restitution, monetary substitute, good-faith acquisition and a parallel damages claim.

06

Director liability connects the decision, loss and causation

Article 53.1 covers directors, board members and persons exercising factual control. Review the information available, conflicts, ordinary business risk, transaction price and alternatives, corporate loss and joint conduct. The Supreme Court’s 2025 review provides a current analytical framework.

07

A stake dispute starts with the chain of title

Review acquisition, payment, notarial instruments, registry or share-register entries, pledges, inheritance, spousal rights and indirect transactions. The remedy follows the defect: title declaration, invalidity, recovery of property, registry correction, damages or option enforcement.

08

Shareholder exclusion is an exceptional remedy

LLC participants holding at least 10% in aggregate may seek exclusion of a participant whose serious breach makes the company’s activity impossible or materially obstructs it. The case must show conduct, consequences and why a less intrusive remedy will not remove the obstruction.

09

Deadlock is resolved by changing mechanics or separating interests

Test whether required decisions truly cannot be made and who created the impasse. Solutions include interim governance, an independent director, expert determination, revised reserved matters, bridge funding, one side’s buyout, business sale or asset division.

10

Interim relief preserves the dispute without shutting the company

Article 225.6 of the Commercial Procedure Code permits attachment of shares, transaction or registry restraints and other measures. The application links a specific risk to enforceability, proposes a proportionate scope and avoids making corporate activity impossible.

Shares
Restrain disposal or encumbrance of the disputed block.
Asset
Target the specific transaction rather than general business.
Registry
A focused filing restraint where the risk is evidenced.
Counter-security
Financial readiness may strengthen the application.

11

The corporate nature of the claim determines forum and arbitrability

Article 225.1 covers ownership, governance, transactions, damages, meetings and shareholders’ agreements. Arbitration of eligible disputes remains subject to statutory exclusions, special procedure and administration by a permanent arbitral institution.

12

Negotiation starts after procedural leverage is secured

Before proposing price, assess valuation, control premium or discount, debt, disputed distributions, tax and each party’s ability to fund. Compare scenarios by time, cost, asset-loss risk and enforceability—not only pleaded value.

13

A corporate settlement is a miniature M&A deal

It may combine a stake sale, resignations, releases, dividend or debt payment, document handover, security release and confidentiality. Simultaneous performance, escrow or another payment mechanism, approvals, tax analysis and default remedies are essential.

14

The best corporate dispute is resolved before it begins

The charter and shareholders’ agreement predefine information, governance, reserved matters, budget, conflicts, related-party transactions, funding default, deadlock, options and exit. Proper minutes and independent review of material transactions narrow the dispute space.

15

Initial conflict review pack

Charter and shareholders’ agreement; ownership structure; registry or share register; minutes and notices; disputed transactions; bank statements; accounting data; communications; powers; asset information; litigation and enforcement; desired commercial outcome.

Legal basis

In a corporate dispute, the correct remedy matters more than the number of claims

One conflict may involve a decision, transaction, stake, loss and information, but each claim has its own elements, deadline and consequences.

01

АПК РФ, статья 225.1

Категории корпоративных споров и условия передачи отдельных требований в арбитраж.

Open source
02

АПК РФ, статья 225.6

Обеспечительные меры по корпоративным спорам и требование не блокировать деятельность общества.

Open source
03

ГК РФ, статья 53.1

Ответственность руководителей, членов органов и фактически контролирующих лиц.

Open source
04

ГК РФ, статья 65.2

Права и обязанности участников корпорации и требования, заявляемые в интересах общества.

Open source
05

Закон об ООО, статьи 10, 43 и 50

Исключение участника, обжалование решений органов и доступ к корпоративным документам.

Open source
06

Обзор Верховного Суда РФ от 30 июля 2025 года

Актуальная практика по взысканию убытков с руководителей и иных контролирующих лиц.

Open source

Confidential consultation

Turn the conflict into one strategy

We perform an emergency assessment, preserve evidence and prepare interim relief, a claim map and a negotiation scenario.

Discuss the matter
WAWhatsAppTGTelegram