DIFC case law

Ganesan Muthiah v Abdul Rahman Mohammad [2026] DIFC CA 007

JULY 14, 2026 COURT OF APPEAL - JUDGMENTS

Claim No: CA 007/2026

IN THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

In the name of His Highness Sheikh Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of Dubai

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

BEFORE H.E. DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE ALI AL MADHANI, H.E. JUSTICE PATRICK ANTHONY KEANE AND H.E. JUSTICE LIM THIAM SUAN

BETWEEN

GANESAN MUTHIAH

Claimant/Respondent

and

ABDUL RAHMAN MOHAMMAD

Defendant/Appellant

Hearing : 22 June 2026 Counsel :

Mr Patrick Dillon – Malone instructed by Clyde & Co LLP, for the Appellant

Mr Quentin Tannock, instructed by Hamdan Al Shamsi Lawyers & Legal Consultants LLC, for the Respondent

Judgment : 14 July 2026

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL

UPON the Part 7 Claim Form dated 9 June 2025 (the “Claim”)

AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi dated 20 October 2025 (the “20 October Order”)

AND UPON the Reasons of H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi for the 20 October Order dated 13 January 2026 (the “13 January Order”)

AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi dated 21 January 2026 refusing permission to appeal the 20 October Order (the “21 January Order”)

AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi dated 29 January 2026 ordering that costs be paid by the Applicant to the Respondent (the “29 January Order”)

AND UPON the Defendants’ renewed Appeal Notice dated 6 February 2026 seeking permission to appeal the 20 October Order, the 21 January Order and the 29 January Order (the “Renewed Permission to Appeal”)

AND UPON the Order of H.E. Chief Justice Wayne Martin dated 26 March 2026 granting the Renewed Permission to Appeal on all grounds (other than those relating to the stay of the costs orders pending determination of the appeal) (the “26 March Order”)

AND UPON hearing Counsel for the Appellant and Counsel for the Respondent at the hearing before H.E. Deputy Chief Justice Ali Al Madhani, H.E. Justice Patrick Anthony Keane and H.E. Justice Lim Thiam Suan (the “Appeal Hearing”)

AND PURSUANT TO the Rules of the DIFC Courts (“RDC”)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Appeal is allowed.

2. The orders made in the 20 October Order are set aside.

3. The costs order in the application to the CFI for permission to appeal made on 21 January 2026 is set aside.

4. The Respondent shall pay the Appellant’s costs of the Appeal fixed in the amount of AED 200,000.

5. The Respondent shall pay the Appellant’s costs of the application to the Chief Justice for permission to appeal on the standard basis to be assessed if not agreed

Issued by: Delvin Sumo Assistant Registrar Date of issue: 14 July 2026 At: 8am

SCHEDULE OF REASONS

1. Central to this appeal is the operation of Dubai Decree No. (29) of 2024 (the “Decree”). The Decree addresses the problems which arise where there is a conflict of jurisdiction between the DIFC Courts and any of the Judicial Entities being the Courts of Greater Dubai. The relevant provisions of the Decree are Articles (4) and (9). They are in the following terms: